Hi friends,
Below are some sample essay responses that received top scores. You can take ideas from these perfect essays.
Topic: Censorship
Sample Question: Do you believe that government should censor the
internet?
It is undoubtedly that internet usage has become crucial nowadays. All people regardless of age, race, and background are using the internet. The world is connecting through the internet for including: running a business, shopping, and even getting education. However, not all the information provided in the internet is suitable for all internet users. Some of them bring disadvantages to the users especially children.
The information in the internet is worldwide that all people can access it easily. There is some inappropriate content especially for children in the internet such as pornography, gambling and so on. In addition, users especially students and adults can be cheated if they engage in gambling. Furthermore, the internet provides computer games, which are the young people’s preferences. They tend to spend a couples of hours a day on it. As a result, other important work such as schoolwork and assignments are neglected.
However, the internet has become the medium of sharing ideas on educational, social, and environmental issues. Such activities can bring benefits in terms of knowledge as well as the awareness of world issues. The internet also assists users make their lives easier and faster. For example, the banking facilities can help users pay their bills in just a minute without queuing up for almost an hour perhaps.
In conclusion, internet information and services have assisted users in their daily life. We should manage it in the right way and do not misuse it. In my point of view, the government should not censor the internet for the people’s sake. On the other hand, the government should ban inappropriate web pages and encourage the knowledgeable ones.
Topic: Advertising
Question: Do you think that advertising encourages people to buy things
that they don’t want?
In the era of globalization, advertising plays a major role in the competitive business world. Many industries capitalize on the power of advertising to attract or to win customers away from their business rivals. The impact of advertising is so huge that it causes many people to purchase things that they do not want initially. Many people do not realize that while advertising encourages people to purchase things they do not want to by conveying misleading ideas and being negatively influential on their decisions, it still provides the avenue for people to choose wisely in their life.
Firstly, advertising encourages people to buy thing they don’t want to through misleading ideas. Advertising is proven to be a successful tool to highlight the features of their product to the public even though the product is deemed undesirable such as cigarettes, drugs, alcohol and so on. For example, Dunhill, a cigarette company which sponsors many football teams, seems to be promoting cigarettes to the public. Without the sponsorship, the company will be less known to the public, resulting in less sales of cigarettes. However, many people smoke nowadays because they are influenced by the successful advertising even though smoking is bad for health.
Besides that, advertising has a large impact on the decisions made by the people in their everyday life. Many businesses use advertising as a form of promotion to create awareness about their product in the market. A new product needs extensive advertising to penetrate intothe market, while existing products require advertising to increase the consumption. For instance, in a fast food industry, the introduction of a new flavour of burger needs advertising to reach the public while the other burgers require advertising to increase consumption. Children, especially, are easily influence by the advertisement and will have the desire to dine at fast food restaurants after that. Although fast food is bad for health, it has successfully become appealing to the public through successful tactics in advertising.
However, advertising encourages people to make the right choices while purchasing things that are essential in their daily live. Advertising plays a part in helping consumers to compare a product in terms of price, quality, reliability and so on. Without advertising, it will be very difficult for consumers to judge the worthiness of a product. For example, advertisements initiated by various companies have given the consumers the opportunity to choose wisely when purchasing an item. Without the power of advertising, consumers will be stuck to a brand which may not offer the best option.
In conclusion, even though advertising have influenced people to buy things that they don’t want by providing misleading ideas and influence people into making wrong decisions, advertising has done people a favour too by helping consumers to choose wisely. Therefore, I agree that advertising causes consumers to buy things they don’t want to but moderation is the key when it comes to choosing the right advertisement.
Topic: Capital Punishment
Question: Do you agree with Capital Punishment?
Nowadays, anti death penalty forces have gained momentum towards abolishing the death penalty. Capital punishment advocates assert that the death penalty brings about deterrent effect and contributes in combating crimes. However, capital punishment should not be imposed on humans as it is cruel and violates human rights, there are possibilities of wrongful executions and capital punishment does not deter crimes.
First, I do not agree with capital punishment because of its cruelty and it violates a human’s right to live. The Death penalty should be prohibited in civilized society as it is indisputably the most cruel and brutal punishment to exist. Some argue that criminals deserve the death penalty for committing heinous and despicable crimes; nevertheless the state-sanctioned killing may actually exacerbate violence and cause an upsurge in the crime rate.
Apart from that, erroneous executions are likely to happen too. It is impossible to eliminate the risk of executing innocent people completely. There might be miscarriages of justice associated with the administration of death penalty resulting from sketchy witness’s testimony, incompetent defense representation and police misconduct. Since innocent lives might be shattered due to the reasons above, capital punishment should not be carried out.
In addition, capital punishment does not deter crimes effectively. Thus, it should be eradicated in view of the fact that it doesn’t serve its purpose as efficacious deterrent to crimes. A survey conducted illustrated that non death penalty states actually had consistently lower murder rates compared to death penalty states.Furthermore, perpetrators who commit crimes in the heat of passion and possibly under the influence of drugs or alcohol. In this case, the threat of being put to death failed in acting as a deterrent as criminals do not even think about the possible
outcome of their actions.
In conclusion, capital punishment should not be practiced. Perhaps alternatives to it can be taken into consideration. Life imprisonment appears as a feasible solution. Besides, rehabilitation of criminals is imperative too, instead of just sending them to gallows. Capital punishment should not be imposed for the betterment of mankind.
Topic: Careers
Question: People are starting to think that the idea of giving a single career is an old fashioned one, discuss
People are starting to think that the idea if having a single career is an old fashioned one, but if you look closely at the issue you may find that it is employers rather than employees that have shifted the viewpoint.
Originally people had job security and father and son would pass down their jobs to the next generation, but in the late 1950’s that began to change as there was easier access to education. This led to children and parents having different careers, when coupled with events from the industrial revolution and increasing mechanization led to the increase of large corporations
These large corporations pushed for greater flexibility in the workforce. This allowed them to ‘hire and fire’ people with greater ease and change their organizations according to the needs of customers.
To adapt to this new environment people had to learn that a job is NOT for life and to ensure their employability they needed to not just have one skill, but many. This in turn led to people talking about the need to retrain and reskill. In my short career I have held a number of jobs in a number of companies. This would have been unusual in the 1950’s.
To take the argument further would people choose to do this? Flexibility in skills unfortunately has not led to greater job security. People are not often given the chance by a company to retrain rather than be made redundant. In fact the quality of living has decreased since 1976 in the UK and the amount of stress has increased.
Part of the reason for this is that people are not just expected to do their jobs, but also to learn new skills, rather than talk of job security we are told of job flexibility. The reality of this is that people lose their jobs. In 2002 10% of employees at the company I worked at lost their jobs. So ask me if the idea of a ‘single career’ is old fashioned and I would say yes, but ask me if I like the idea and I would say no, because it has also meant the loss of job security and an increase in stress levels.
Topic: Children
Question: What rights do you believe children should have?
In the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, every member of the human race is entitled to “dignity” which implies that every person has the right to be respected. Although children are synonym as an offspring that are yet to be mature enough to understand the significance of decorum, their rights should be given a priority by the community. For instance, the African government proclaimed that childhood elucidates to a “special care and assistance”. In my book, it is crucial for a child to have the right to live, the right to be protected, as well as the right to obtain an omniscient development.
Children should be subsidized with the basic necessities such as inadequate food supply, the provision of appropriate asylum, and the establishment of a proper healthcare system. Unlike the animal kingdom, where lionesses abandon their cubs to the survival of the fittest, an evergreen child should be equipped with sufficient amount of nutrients and care from their parents in order to sustain their life, Furthermore, ample protection should be given to these small creatures as they often tend to be the victim of being bullied or harassed. A study conducted in the University of Reading corroborates that almost 70% of the students being traumatized by the impudence act performed on them, poses a bad memory power.
Lastly, an equal allocation of knowledge is vital to thwart the minorities or a certain ethnic groups from being deprived by the intellectual society. Therefore, it is paramount for the government to establish an omniscient education system as the children do have the rights to acquire a pool of knowledge without any restrictions.
To sum up, a holistic approach is needed to remedy such compound and cumulative violations of the children’s rights
Topic: Drunk Driving
Question: Do you think that it is wrong for people to drink alcohol and then
drive? Do you think they should be punished?
It is sad but true that the number of road accidents is increasing nowadays and the statistic keeps rising. Many innocent people die on the roads every day. It is not a new thing for us anymore. One of the major reasons that lead to road accidents would be drinking and driving. That is definitely wrong for those who drink alcohol and then drive and they should be punished.
First of all, they are wrong in doing so because they are not responsible. People who drink and then drive are not concerned about other people’s safety. Those who are drunk are unable to drive with a clear mind. For example, they may think that they are driving in the correct lane but actually they are not. Such action are more than enough to put other drivers in danger.
Secondly, this is such an irresponsible activity because they do not appreciate precious life. Those who are drunk cannot access or react quickly to any bad situation that suddenly arises on the roads such as bad roads conditions and so on. Obviously, all of us can see what the outcome can be. One car crash with another one as well as the drivers may simply lose their life in a blink of an eye.
In this case, the government has an important role to play. Since drunk drivers are a very great danger to themselves and to other road-users, therefore they should be punished. One way to do this is through law enforcement. The authorities may fine them heavily and give them mandatory jail sentences. The fine may become a burden for them and they dare not break the law when driving on the roads.
Once again, government intervention is necessary in this case. Another way that can be carried out by the government would be to suspend their licenses for a certain period. Driving is an essential activity for some people. Therefore, such a punishment is very helpful in making the people aware of road safety because they are not willing to let their licenses be suspended for such a long time.
In short, it is absolutely wrong for people to drink alcohol and then drive. So, they themselves must hold the responsibility by receiving the punishment according to the law.
